Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravinder Bansal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It's been two weeks and there have been no delete !votes. Saying this, the rationales for keep are very weak, but exist nonetheless. Anarchyte (talk • work) 10:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ravinder Bansal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is just on the back of a WP:BLP1E. Fails Wp:GNG, WP:SIGCOV RationalPuff (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The event itself seems noteworthy, and notability has been established by RS coverage. And specifically with regards to the BLP1E argument, I don't think the conditions are met (also FWIW, I don't think it was intended for cases quite like this, although I could be wrong). --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Flying around the world solo is certainly a notable historical achievement with major news coverage. Ambrosiawater (talk) 19:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep he is really notable person with historical achievement. So keep. VocalIndia (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.