Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rated A for Awesome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rated A for Awesome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of reputable, secondary, non-independent sources. I attempted to search for sources (I am not extended confirmed yet, so I could not access The Wikipedia Library) to no avail. Even if I could find sources, the entire episode list would need to be rebuilt using the correct template, and the writers, storyboard artists, & directors' identities would need to be verified. After further research, I can confidently say that this show fails the general notability guideline. Namethatisnotinuse Namethatisnotinuse (talk) 22:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Fellow Library user/animation fan chiming in. Starting off with the most—and only—substantial material I could find on PQ at this writing (amid a slew of mere mentions and TV listings); further research elsewhere needed. (This debate was on my radar for days now, but I got too carried away by personal book duties, the fall of the Reddit and Twitter empires in real time, and my newfound itch for WP:Rater.)

  "Disney co-pros Awesome cartoon series". Broadcast. Emap. 2011-04-13. Retrieved 2023-07-04 – via ProQuest. Disney's UK-based production hub has co-produced a CG animated comedy which will in 129 countries on the Disney XD channel...52 x 11-minute adventure story.

--Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 00:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above plus an in-depth review from staff of a reliable source: [1] —siroχo 21:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Siroxo. After my own search I was not expecting this to clear the GNG but the above sources appear sufficient. -- Visviva (talk) 23:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.