Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapture (comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Without prejudice to an appropriate redirect j⚛e decker ^talk 18:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rapture (comics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A character with insufficient third person sources to justify having an article. Unless someone can provide sufficient third person information to justify this article I suggest deletion or merger is the only solution. Dwanyewest (talk) 22:31, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete I only say weak because I am not sure about WP:RS for comics. I am inclined to agree with the nominator.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:47, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - The character gets considerable mentions in Savage Dragon, so a redirect there may be appropriate. However, the character's own article doesn't say anything about her having any special significance to Savage Dragon. Nor does the article cite any sources to indicate notability.--NukeofEarl (talk) 16:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete -A google search for the character brings up comic vine, which I assume is not a verifiable source because it is also a wiki. I'm inclined to think that this character is not that notable, so I am leaning towards delete.PointsofNoReturn (talk) 00:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.