Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramesh Auti
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ramesh Auti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources are of mixed quality, a few don't even mention the subject, and the ones that do only mention his existence, frequently in a list. Little of the actual content even matches the claimed source, and it may be promotional given the username of the creator (speedy deletion tags were already removed once). Searching myself, I see little-to-nothing that could establish notability, and the article is so poorly written that there's nothing here that could be kept in a longshot attempt to build an article. The creator had already been told of the myriad issues at AFC. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - not sure why my CSD nomination got removed. This page was previously deleted. And also, the talk page is a mess. Limmidy (talk) 15:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that it should be speedily deleted. It was the article creator who removed the speedy deletion template. --bonadea contributions talk 19:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Maharashtra. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Xegma(talk) 19:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi there adding some reliable sources in this page. Can you check it. I think it should be ok to keep page Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 01:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. No need to draftify. Note that the article creator moved the article to draftapace, removed the AfD notice, and c&p recreates the article without the afd template. --bonadea contributions talk 18:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- While this is not a vote (since my opinion can be inferred from the initial entry), none of the sources added provide even a spec of notability, and they're mostly YouTube videos. Frankly, this is in WP:SALT territory. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 02:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wp.Ramesh Auti. Might be a candidate for G5 speedy deletion as well.--bonadea contributions talk 19:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi there adding some reliable sources in this page. Can you check it. I think it should be ok to keep page. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 01:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- None of the new sources is reliable, independent, or in any way useful as a source. Here's an overview of the sources in the current version of the article:
Source assessment table: prepared by User:Bonadea
| ||||
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://nettv4u.com/celebrity/bhojpuri/editor/ramesh-auti |  blatant promotion
|
nettv4u.com is generally unreliable, see WP:ICTFSOURCES
|
very brief
|
✘ No |
| http://www.bhojpurifilmiduniya.com/2016/07/ek-rajai-teen-lugai.html | ? | Claims to be a blog, clearly a content scraper
|
No information about Auti, just mentions his name in a cast list
|
✘ No |
| https://www.marathifilmdata.com/chitrapat/katibandha/ | ? | ? A database of Marathi films, no information about publisher | No information about Auti, just mentions his name in a staff list
|
✘ No |
| https://siraj7.rssing.com/chan-29175398/all_p17.html | ? | Self-published source (blog)
|
Auti's name is mentioned once
|
✘ No |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPCNQTNAc8Y | A film uploaded to Youtube, used as a source for the fact that Auti worked on it
|
The film itself
|
No information about Auti
|
✘ No |
| https://cityliveindia.com/city/dhanbad/Article?CL=Harshita-Ojha-will-be-seen-soon-in-a-short-film-Sachet-959055 | Press release
|
Promotion piece
|
Auti is not even mentioned!
|
✘ No |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xLrlKU60rQ | A film uploaded to Youtube, used as a source for the fact that Auti worked on it
|
The film itself
|
No information about Auti
|
✘ No |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7ksqg94Me0 | A film uploaded to Youtube, used as a source for the fact that Auti worked on it
|
The film itself
|
No information about Auti
|
✘ No |
| https://www.magzmumbai.com/web-series-hidden-on-ping-pong-ott-platform-from-16th-july/ | Press release
|
Promotional blurb
|
No mention of Auti
|
✘ No |
| https://glamgold.com/ping-pong-otts-web-series-hidden-poster-launched/ | Churnalism based on the same press release as the previous source
|
Promotional piece
|
No mention of Auti in this version either
|
✘ No |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
- Exactly zero reliable sources, and none of them has any information about Auti whatsoever. --bonadea contributions talk 10:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Bonadea's source analysis; no sign of notability of any flavour. (No objection to speedying, if preferred.) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Wp.ramesh wiki is now indefinitely blocked for persistent disruptive editing. ----Kinu t/c 18:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)