Talk:Ramesh Auti

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Please check all References

Hi anyone tell me why this page is delated request. All the references are correct with Ramesh Auti/ रमेश औटी. You can check again and correct this. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 19:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clear the topic

(Redacted) Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ha haa. Theroadislong (talk) 22:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hey thanks for connect. Can you tell me what is that actual problem in References this page. You check all websites Ramesh Auti/रमेश औटी name is showing. So I m not understand what exactly... Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there try with new References. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 00:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding new References

Hi anyone can see Ramesh Auti page new References added. I think this is ok to page keep it. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 00:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you've still added next to nothing that indicates notability. Adding a bunch of YouTube videos -- which are not reliable sources -- doesn't make it any better. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 02:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But youtube sources accept on wikipedia pages. In youtube video description clearly show this user worked. And videos available on registered company pages. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 03:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're providing an excellent example of why YouTube is rarely a reliable source. A YouTube video can says that spaghetti is made of leprechauns, but it doesn't make it true. There's a whole entry at WP:RSPYT on the topic.
I don't know whether it's WP:IDHT or WP:CIR -- the article itself is completely unreadable aside from the poor sourcing -- but you're not listening to anything that anyone has told you. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change Written Style

Hi anyone here, thanks for telling me what should change. I have change article writing style. I know page sources is poor but it's a real or giving some information about user. Thanks. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody doubts that the person is real, the problem is that they are NOT notable in Wikipedia terms. Theroadislong (talk) 08:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi i could not understand which wikipedia terms exactly you are saying. can you gide me. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 10:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wp.ramesh wiki: If you take a look at the deletion discussion, I have added a table to explain why none of the sources shows that the person is notable. --bonadea contributions talk 10:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
if wesites is open and showed user Ramesh Auti/रमेश औटी sentence as an editor or that means he done serval works. so this is also notable and reliable. only website content editor has permission to create that type edits. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 11:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the film editors name show only on film posters. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 11:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's only verification that he exists and film editors aren't inherently notable. No reliable, detailed sources means no article. Not everything that exists requires a Wikipedia article. You've had concepts like notability described for you and linked for you repeatedly. At this point, it's hard to not come to the conclusion that you're either ignoring everything said to you or that your English fluency is not sufficient to participate in the English edition of Wikipedia. I suspect it's the latter given that what you have written is barely comprehensible English. There's no shame in that; while I speak three languages other than English well enough for day-to-day activities in those countries, I certainly recognize that I'm not at the level at which I ought to be writing articles on German, Spanish, or French Wikipedia. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 11:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]