Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quintin Torres-Costa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. WP:NPASR applies. ✗plicit 02:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quintin Torres-Costa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run of the mill former minor league baseball player. Lacks significant coverage to pass WP:GNG Yankees10 01:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I see what appears to be four unique reliable sources on the page. West Hawaii Today, Honolulu Star-Advertiser, KHON, Hawaii Tribune-Herald. - Scarpy (talk) 00:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The sources also have to contain non-routine SIGCOV to meet GNG. They all seem like routine transfer announcements to me. JoelleJay (talk) 03:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are incorrect. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. - Scarpy (talk) 02:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.