Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional Korean Warcraft III competition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:17, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Professional Korean Warcraft III competition

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Database-like list of sports results with no indication of why any is important. WP:NOTDATABASE

An alternative could be merging it with Warcraft III in esports, but would likely just clutter the page with these outdated stats. Gaioa (T C L) 11:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Gaioa (T C L) 11:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Gaioa (T C L) 11:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Gaioa (T C L) 11:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not appear to fit in with criterion 3 --K. Peake 13:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Largely non-notable content. We're not a database of every competition that ever occurred ever. Treating it as a list also would fail LISTN, I believe. Individual competitions may be verifiable but are they discussed as a group? Especially specific to Korea alone? -- ferret (talk) 13:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cursory search on Google Books and News shows plenty of sources seem to exist and that the subject appears to be notable. AFD is not cleanup. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Poorly scoped and rarely/never discussed as a group (LISTN). The individual events' existences are not a matter of this nomination. IceWelder [✉] 09:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.