Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pietro Balbo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 06:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pietro Balbo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is very low on reliable references, and the ones that are there don't demonstrate notability. Balbo does not meet WP:CRIME, and an internet search brought up no sources on him. Noahfgodard (talk) 04:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2020-08 ✍️ create

Weak keep, a search on newspapers.com and Proquest indicates that his criminal case (where he gets his notability) was widely covered for its time, across multiple months and in papers like The New York Times and The Boston Globe and The St. Louis Post-Dispatch. There's some coverage (cannot see to verify the depth) in modern scholarly publications as well, see this JSTOR search. Seems to meet GNG, if barely. There's another Pietro Balbo, who may be more notable. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Eddie891 and WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.