Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Rodriguez (fighter)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space and submit it to AFC, contact me. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Rodriguez (fighter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails General Notability and also MMA notability TestingBoy (talk) 22:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Martial arts. TestingBoy (talk) 22:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the mmafighting.com article read in conjunction with the rest of the sources amounts to SIGCOV Jack4576 (talk) 13:56, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I provide enough source for page to be okay for mainspace as well provding his backround etc..Pete is more notable then some other mma fighters that already have page but didnt fight in notable promotion unlike him. He is still active and signed with UFC .DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 15:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The bigger MMA Fighting article is routine pre-match hype and anyway only contains 2.5 sentences on him. None of the other sources amount to SIGCOV. JoelleJay (talk) 20:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete Draftify classic case of WP:TOOSOON. Ammending to draftify, as fighter will meet notability eventually.Nswix (talk) 02:29, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails GNG and NMMA. Sources mainly on routine reports - TOOSOON. Cassiopeia talk 04:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Drafity He will soon meet NMMA, so no reason to delete when the article may well be recreated fairly soon. Seacactus 13 (talk) 17:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Question Why do several of you think he will soon meet WP:NMMA? That requires a top 10 world ranking and fightmatrix currently has him at #555. Papaursa (talk) 03:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Sources in the article and BEFORE show primary, promo and stats, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  06:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete MMAJunkie and Yahoo Sports all have some mentions of this person, but that's all, mentions only. Oaktree b (talk) 19:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As I mentioned above, his ranking doesn't get him anywhere near WP notability. Fight results and announcements, along with appearances in MMA databases, also doesn't put him close to meeting WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 00:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Lethweimaster (talk) 10:53, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.