Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennsylvania Rebellion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 22:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania Rebellion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too green for an encyclopedia article, team established this month hasn't even played yet and it would play only next year. Alex^{discussion ★} 02:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A new team appearing in a professional softball league. buff bills 7701 12:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Softball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As a new team appearing in a professional sports league. Not out of line at all for the way this type of situation is normally handled. Ejgreen77 (talk) 06:29, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:23, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A women's new team appearing in a professional sports league should be kept.--DThomsen8 (talk) 03:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Soft Keep currently it is only just notable, bordering on wp:CRYSTAL, but there's just enough so far for that to not apply. Neonchameleon (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.