Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Mozer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:10, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Mozer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Textbook case of WP:BLP1E. Toddst1 (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think this is excluded from that guide by the following exception: "the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial and well-documented".--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How is the event is significant? John Hinckley, Jr. is an exception to WP:BLP1E because the event, the Reagan_assassination_attempt is significant, hence have an article about the event. Toddst1 (talk) 15:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - originally created by a sockpuppet so should've been deleted a long, long time ago. Lukeno94 (talk) 10:21, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this article is indeed excluded from WP:BLP1E per "the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial and well-documented". also per WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask the same question I didn't get an answer to above: "How is the event significant?" Toddst1 (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- I cannot understand why this article would even be considered for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.137.241 (talk) 23:37, 26 November 2012 (UTC) — 86.168.137.241 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:15, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

STRONG Delete: per WP:BLP1E. Subject is not exempt. Comparing this accountant/trader to the man who shot President Reagan is borderline silliness. He was a minor player who worked for a company fined by the US Governement. Outside of this one event, a topic already covered elsewhere, he is a complete unknown. There were literally hundreds of people who got in trouble over that company's schemes. Do they all get Wikipedia articles? --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:37, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no only the notable ones like this article. --BabbaQ (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

or not. Toddst1 (talk) 21:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, BLP1E. --Shorthate (talk) 00:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.