Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Binder
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:43, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Patrick Binder
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Patrick Binder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
doesn't seem to pass GNG NAH 13:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per my reasonings in this discussion I just started. ミラP 17:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Per the discussion I was involved in. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 18:33, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one. But this makes no other claim that he has any preexisting notability for other reasons besides the candidacy, and is referenced entirely to the party's and council's own self-published content about themselves rather than any evidence that he has received enough reliable source coverage to claim a WP:GNG pass. Bearcat (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - we have deleted articles about losing candidates. I don't see consensus changing anytime soon. As Bearcat, no relation, notes: the only sources about his party "leadership" are not independent of the subject. He's an ordinary fundraiser for a Rightist party. If he been embroiled in a fundraising scandal or it turns out he took foreign oligarch money then he would deserve inclusion. There's no evidence of that. Bearian (talk) 15:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.