Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parker Theatre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus to delete. Merge is an option that may be discussed on the talk page. Shimeru (talk) 07:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parker Theatre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like McKenna Theatre, I can find no significant coverage of this small, college theatre building. Any gNews hits are unrelated or event listings. As with McKenna, the article also doesn't attempt to assert any notability, but no speedy criteria seems to quite fit for a building. » scoops “5x5„ 14:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Needs a whole bunch of quality tags: a coherent lead, wikification, and so on. Give broad leeway to public buildings, chances are the information will be useful to someone eventually. Carrite (talk) 15:15, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So wp:ITSUSEFUL because? Just saying it might be useful in the future isn't a constructive argument. » scoops “5x5„ 17:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — under a google search for parker theatre new paltz there are 21,500 results for this locationDemetri Music™ 16:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tzim78 (talk • contribs)

The number of wp:GHITS alone is not a good indication of notability. As I mentioned in my nomination, deeper searches at gNews and gBooks turn up no wp:RELIABLE sources. » scoops “5x5„ 17:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No significant coverage that I can see. Rehevkor ✉ 18:41, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to State University of New York at New Paltz as a separate chapter. ----DanTD (talk) 18:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

very weak keep [1] provides a bit of detail. The primary sources provide plenty. Eh, I really really suspect someone has written a book about the school and a theater that sees as much use (and has the history this one does) likely has enough coverage. But I can't find it. Hobit (talk) 00:53, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I object to the proposer of the AfD debating the comments about the proposal which are not to his liking. Make your nomination, state your case, and let the chips fall where they may, please. Carrite (talk) 15:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.