Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris By Night 70
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Paris By Night#List of Paris By Night episodes. Secret account 21:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Paris By Night 70 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There has been insufficient notability information provided, with no references or citations. The article has not been improved for verification. TRL (talk) 04:08, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Paris By Night#List of Paris By Night episodes. -- Whpq (talk) 16:53, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 16:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as article on episode of popular TV series. Alternatively, merging and redirecting to parent article or an article on the show's episodes would be okay too. Candleabracadabra (talk) 05:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - What makes this particular episode notable? It is unsourced, and as far as I can tell, there is no significant coverage about this episode. -- Whpq (talk) 10:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.