Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pace Center for Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 07:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pace Center for Girls

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not clear. Bedivere (talk) 22:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Florida. Bedivere (talk) 22:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could've been softdeleted though. Bedivere (talk) 00:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another closer might chose to do that. But I don't like to delete an article based on one editor's opinion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:18, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough Bedivere (talk) 06:19, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Multiple newspaper articles are already present as references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
None of which goes in detail into the center. Bedivere (talk) 01:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't think any WP:BEFORE was performed. A quick look at Google Scholar will show that their are many, many publications that talk in-depth about the orginization. Of the references in the article: PNJ and JJIE has significant coverage about the organization. And a search on google news will show many, many more. (Note, I am the creator of the article). -- Mike 🗩 14:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I went to Proquest via the wikipedia library, and found a lot of information. Some of it, like this is definitely significant coverage. So is this journal article. There are more. Pick your notability guideline, this meets it. I guess WP:NCORP is probably the right one, maybe WP:NSCHOOL? In any case, I would say the notability is clear, no matter how you classify the article. Jacona (talk) 17:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems to have sufficient references for support. - Indefensible (talk) 00:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.