Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega Prime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Autobots#Robots in Disguise. JohnCD (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Omega Prime

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Transformers through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 16:24, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to List of Autobots. I don't see any notability, and finding reliable sources has proved difficult. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:30, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs sources to be keep. There are lots of YouTube videos that feature that Autobot, can those be used?Frmorrison (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube videos are not reliable sources. Reliable sources would be a newspaper, magazine, academic journal, or website with editorial control and a history of fact-checking. Fansites, blogs, YouTube videos and other user-generated content do not count as reliable sources and can not be used to establish notability. If no professional journalists deem a topic worthy of note, then Wikipedia does not, either. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:00, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 21:48, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to List of Autobots. No sources, fails WP:GNG.Folken de Fanel (talk) 16:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.