Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norma De Saint Picman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete after discounting the socks. Courcelles (talk) 13:49, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Norma De Saint Picman

Norma De Saint Picman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Look like a spam, poor quality and messy reference, pictures of this article also seemed to be copyright violations. How could this passed AFC review？ -Lemonaka‎ 10:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -Lemonaka‎ 10:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, Environment, France, and Slovenia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi Spiderone, article is describing original works and environmental processes bz artist Norma De Saint Picman, thanks for remowing from deletion lists Eleonorahon (talk) 12:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lemonaka, pictures are original with no copyright violations, thanks for remowing a note for deletion Eleonorahon (talk) 12:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Missing independent reliable sources, no evidence of notability. --TadejM ^{my talk} 07:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. Missing reliable sources. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Norma De Saint Picman graphical works / etchings, lithographs, are included in Bibliotheque Nationale de Paris, by her previous name Natacha Pičman, [1], [2], [3], [4], the last book original illustration for Auteur(s) : Sébaoun, Wilfrid (1928-....)

Autre(s) auteur(s) : Abécassis, Anna (1946?-2003). Illustrateur Voir les notices liées en tant qu'auteur Belfis, Michèle. Illustrateur Voir les notices liées en tant qu'auteur Pičman, Natacha. Illustrateur, this is regardsing her graphic work.

• Keep Nora De Saint Picman Associated Fragments of Reality, Exhibition in Museum of Gorenjska, Nora de Saint Picman is a visual artist who deliberately transitions between various artistic media and connects them in her public projects, artistic cycles, and thematic challenges. She blends classical artistic expressions with new technological approaches. Painting, drawing, printmaking, collage, sculpture, photography, and screen images are the means by which the author shapes and assembles visual organisms that can be specially designed for a given gallery space. The diverse artistic images and practices are combined into unified visual and ambient installations that cannot be evaluated as self-sufficient entities. The postmodernist opening of the creative field within the narrow art gallery area is always associated with the author's expression of personal engagement. In terms of content, the author's art projects can be defined as an artistic response to a creative impulse, phenomenon, state, or event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleonorahon (talk • contribs) 01:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Still missing independent reliable in-depth sources. --TadejM ^{my talk} 10:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, this page seemed to be vandalized by sockpuppet, @TadejM@Spiderone and @WomenArtistUpdates, I've filed an SPI request on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Eleonorahon -Lemonaka‎ 11:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• CU note to closer The above discussion is a bit of a mess with the unsigned comments, but Eleonorahon and Norawaterlilies, who left them, are confirmed to one another. I've struck through one of them. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.