Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyễn Thành Vinh
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- Nguyễn Thành Vinh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unotable volleyball player with a dead link-on a interesting note somehow it changed people from a IP that was logged out a year ago to a soccer player. Wgolf (talk) 19:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 17:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ATHLETE. Another article, for a minor player, that doesn't assert notability. I found a lot of matches to the name in Vietnamese -- but based on Google translate, they seem to mostly be about a lawyer or an author, not a volleyball player. Other than that: little stuff (like the Asian Beach Games); nothing useful. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 21:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Unsourced BLP about a volleyball player who doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.