Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyễn Phú Hoàng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nguyễn Phú Hoàng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. Playing in fledgling Vietnam Basketball Association does not meet WP:NHOOPS. Like a recent AfD and a recent PROD, seems to be part of a spate of creations of VBA players. Sources are either affiliated with the league, from state-sponsored agencies Việt Nam News or Vietnam Television, or from sites like bongro24h.vn, with disclaimer sounding like the site is related to the state also: "Toàn bộ nội dung bài viết, ý kiến thành viên được kiểm duyệt, cung cấp và bảo trợ thông tin bởi Báo Thể Thao Việt Nam – Cơ quan thuộc Tổng Cục Thể Dục Thể Thao. (All content, comments, comments are moderated, provided and sponsored information by the Sports Newspaper Vietnam - Agency under the General Department of Physical Education)" —Bagumba (talk) 11:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No question about it. DaHuzyBru (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as National television and national newspapers, that they are state owned is irrelevant for non-political subjects - the BBC is a state corporation but it is still a reliable source, passes WP:GNG regards, Atlantic306 (talk) 17:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The BBC is not in a Communist country.—Bagumba (talk) 17:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. – Sabbatino (talk) 09:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails to meet WP:NHOOPS and WP:GNG. Playing in the Southeast Asian Games is not enough to show notability and most of the coverage is about him being on that team with the rest being routine coverage of the VBA. Papaursa (talk) 00:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.