Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Net-C (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that, through the French sources, notability is established. Some advertorial concerns are noted and may well be grounds for any extensive rewrite (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 18:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Net-C

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product by a non-notable organization. Somewhat promotional. Doesn't have enough coverage in notable articles, someone who knows french might be able to help here. All quoted sources except one are primary. I was about to nominate for CSD A7 but an article on a BNP Paribas site made reconsider that. Daiyusha (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The French article has reliable sources from L'Obs, Le Parisien, Le Républicain Lorrain which make it pass WP:GNG. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per above. French article is well cited and demonstrates notability. — Stevey7788 (talk) 01:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as sources show that it meets WP:GNG. However, I almost !voted delete as per WP:TNT, since in its current incarnation it is pretty much simply a promotional brochure.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.