Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nea Anna Simone

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nea Anna Simone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references here don't support a notability claim: the first one is a reference to a book written by the subject, and the two following this are to sources that are not independent (and were probably also written by the subject). Google News produces no hits for her; the nomination for the award for her book is only a nomination, not an award, and while it might be useful for a Wikipedia article on that book, isn't useful for establishing her own notability. One of the references given here says she is a New York Times best seller— I could find no evidence of this (if true, this would probably show up on a Google News search). Not enough independent reliable secondary sources to pass WP:BLP nor WP:GNG (unless I am mistaken?). A loose necktie (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 14:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.