Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathalie Weinzierl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nathalie Weinzierl

Non-notable figure skater, fails WP:V. At age 14, she's never even competed in senior nationals, which means she fails the WP:ATHLETE criterion of competing at the "highest level of amateur sport." With only 76 unique G-hits [1], almost exclusively Wiki mirrors and figure skating websites, there are no reliable sources evident that would fulfill the general notability criteria. Prod removed by creator without comment. RGTraynor 14:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per RG. Fails WP:ATHLETE -Djsasso (talk) 19:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the condition she competes at the ISU Junior Grand Prix event in Great Britain in two weeks. If she does, she's a notable Junior skater, who will make her Senior deubt this season. Kolindigo (talk) 20:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We don't keep articles on something that might happen. Even if she is at the Junior Grand Prix, that is not the highest level of amateur competition and still wouldn't meet the expectations of WP:ATHLETE. As far as figure skating goes, the highest level of competition would be competitors in the Olympics or the World Championships. Also in general "junior" anything is not considered notable because the competition is not the highest level available, the highest level available always has no restrictions on age beyond a minimum age. -Djsasso (talk) 21:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 21:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Proxy User (talk) 21:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Would you care to proffer any grounds for your view? RGTraynor 16:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete I'm not sure we would accept competing in a junior event as notability, and we certainly cant accept the possibility of doing so as notability. 04:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.