Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Wheen

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I almost relisted this instead of closing it as a keep, however, looking at the policy based arguments, and looking at what's been doing with the article, it's pretty clear that there's a consensus to keep and some editors like RebeccaGreen, PamD, and Phil Bridger have taken steps to improve the article and address the concerns that Meszzy2 had. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 08:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Wheen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP which references no secondary sources, and doesn't seem to have any that I can find. Seems to fail WP:Basic. The radio presenter themselves doesn't seem very notable for inclusion - nominated for an award twice 20 years ago and 'was placed third in a poll of "most attractive radio voices."' Meszzy2 (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 20:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 20:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.