Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nat Sullivan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. L Faraone 00:26, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nat Sullivan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking ghits and gnews of substance. Article makes a number of claims, but fails to provide support for claims. reddogsix (talk) 16:12, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (talkin' to me?) @ 16:28, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (babble) @ 16:28, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (confer) @ 16:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (whisper) @ 16:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Little or no coverage in reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 18:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.