Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagayana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Varies. Consensus to delete Jupiter Circus, to redirect Pratishodh Ki Jwala and to merge Nagayana. Sandstein 18:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nagayana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a comic "crossover event" with no references that demonstrate notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related article, about a comic story arc and a fictional location with no indications of notability:

Cordless Larry (talk) 07:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nagayana must be merged to Nagraj comics and shortened. Jupiter Circus and Pratishodh Ki Jwala must be deleted. From someone who actually read these comics years ago. In what sense the Jupiter Circus article was kept here for years? Captain Spark (talk) 12:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Just because nobody noticed it, I guess, Captain Spark. There are lots of similarly problematic articles about aspects of these comics, I am increasinly discovering. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Nagayana as suggested above. Pratishodh Ki Jwala should probably be a redirect to Super Commando Dhruva. I don't think any content needs to be moved. Delete Jupiter Circus - there's nothing there worth keeping, and a redirect is unnecessary. The only things that link to it come from a template. Argento Surfer (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.