Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nafisa Kamal

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. I do not think the nominator acted in bad faith when they made this nomination. However, I think that the nomination is sufficiently flawed and that Shahidul Hasan Roman would not be the only editor to point out that the subject meets the notability criteria. —C.Fred (talk) 18:43, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nafisa Kamal

Nafisa Kamal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is not even notable person to list in the Wikipedia!

This article is biased and created by admin some unauthorized site information in different language

Wikipedia:Notability (people) policy does not follow this article An admin created this article,please remove it! Mrittika.mehjabin (talk) 05:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep It's look like pure vandalism by the nominator of this Articles for deletion page creator (Mrittika.mehjabin ). Currently he/she is with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia) reason. The user is doing general pattern of disruptive behavior and editing as a battleground. Nafisa Kamal is enough notable for staying in wikipedia & the article is written with enough and trusted news source.
  • Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
  • Has made unique, prolific contributions to a field of entertainment(sports).
  • The person has created or played a major role in creating a significant or well-known work.
  • The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. (women empowerment in Bangladesh)
  • He has been writing enough in the newspaper.
  • All the references to the article are written about her. --Shahidul Hasan Roman (talk) 21:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.