Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myriam Joire (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:42, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Myriam Joire

Myriam Joire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No improvement in terms of notability since the previous AfD nomination. Of numerous refs, only 3 are not by her: two are intervierws with her (one of which which descrives her "...a technological pioneer has a diverse career behind her, during which, as one of the world's leading technology journalists..." -- oh, rlly?, another is 100% about her sexuality, hardly a claim of notability today) and one more is a brief note that she was fired without explanations. So much for WP:GNG. - Altenmann >talk 22:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Video games, Technology, France, Canada, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Lots of articles written by her for Endgadget and TechRadar, nothing about her. Delete for lack of sourcing; what's used in the article isn't helpful. Oaktree b (talk) 00:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Sourcing in the article is mostly primary; TechCrunch is an iffy source per source toolbot. Rest aren't helpful Oaktree b (talk) 00:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. On Newspapers Extended she's quoted in 2007 (re keyboards) and again in 2014 (Oakland Tribune, re Pebble product) but no SIGCOV on her. BBQboffin^{grill me} 20:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.