Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Timothy Brenton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep - Withdrawn by nominator. Transcendence (talk) 20:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Timothy Brenton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT. No lasting effects or national/global scope. Transcendence (talk) 18:44, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination Withdrawn - per Tiptoety Transcendence (talk) 20:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is not your run of the mill murder. This incident received national media coverage and the suspect was linked to another high visibility attack in which he is accused of engaging in a firebombing. This incident was also part of a group of attacks on law enforcement (to include Lakewood, Washington police officer shooting) that continually received national media attention. Additionally per WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, the trial of the suspected murder has continued to receive lasting media attention years after the incident. Tiptoety ^talk 19:39, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The points you bring up suggest notability for the suspect, not the murder victim. Transcendence (talk) 20:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing some more research so I'll withdraw the nomination if it's clear I'm wrong. Transcendence (talk) 20:44, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.