Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Liu Hong Mei

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Liu Hong Mei

Murder of Liu Hong Mei (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable murder. Coverage is all run-of-the-mill. WP is not crime blotter. WP:LASTING not satisfied. Beerest 2 talk 19:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 20:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 20:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 20:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 20:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 22. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 20:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The only sort of lasting coverage comes from the "10 most gruesome murders", and that's only a couple sentences and doesn't show a long term effect at all. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable - neither the circumstances of the murder nor the means of disposal of the corpse are particularly unusual, and it has no lasting significance. --AJHingston (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Wikipedia is not a compendium of true crime stories or accounts of isolated awful events covered by newspapers as part of their daily business. My condolences to the family and friends of the victim. Carrite (talk) 17:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.