Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Glenn Kopitske

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Glenn Kopitske

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A sad story but simply fails the notability test $Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...)$ 10:51, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has significant national coverage beyond the local reporting you'd typically see with a murder. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:53, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, after a perusal of some simple research I was able to find significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject matter that fit WP:RS and WP:V and WP:N. — Cirt (talk) 19:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This murder and the trial have recieved significant coverage in reliable secondary sources:

--В и к и T 20:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:GNG. Insomesia (talk) 00:19, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ohnoitsjamie. Rivertorch (talk) 18:09, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.