Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morten Kristiansen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 20:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Morten Kristiansen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD: "over 100 matches in top tier should be enough". This is incorrect (some of the matches were in the second tier) and in any case they happened well before the Norwegian men's football league was anything close to 'fully professional'. Accordingly they resulted in little evidence of WP:GNG-level coverage. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:34, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Probably keep I disagree with this also, I see sources I can't read, match reports mostly, over 100 games played for one club seems enough of a footing for GNG in my opinion. There are inherent weaknesses with the article, I can see why this is nominated due to lack of online sources, however this is the weakness of wikipedia structure and policy allowing these nominations to happen with out a true WP:BEFORE for sources that can inherently be in a newspaper archive, in a book, etc. Govvy (talk) 11:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - he certainly does get some coverage but it's a bit WP:ROUTINE; see Grimstad, Nordlands Framtid and Fremover. I couldn't find anything better than that. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.