Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Kamin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Kamin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On a living Guantanamo prisoner . Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:BIO. There are no secondary sources to claim notability of the subject and the citations used are WP:PRIMARY sources (WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84#Reliability of US military summary reports) DBig Xray 10:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:BLP1E - low profile person whose role role isnt "substantial and well-documented" Crystalfile (talk) 11:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Another Guantanamo article which fails the notability guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 13:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep—Are you kidding? USA Today article on the guy, Reuters article on the guy, The Terrorist List entry on the guy. These are not mentions, but actual items solely about this person. He meets the GNG with ease.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not kidding here. The two article you quoted both are on the "Subject's Gitmo Trial" and the Terrorist List is a comprehensive list which only mentions why he was arrested. All it proves that he was a foot soldier among the thousands of Jehadist warriors and does not prove notability. also fails WP:BLP1E--DBig Xray 16:57, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding when you say they're both about the "Gitmo Trial"? They're both about the subject in their entirety. Each of the two articles is solely about him.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not kidding both the articles are on the "Subject's Gitmo Trial" bolded and added if it wasnt clear in my earlier comment--DBig Xray 17:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. While, as noted, he does not pass the bar for a stand-alone article, he is suitable for inclusion in the list. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. No significant coverage of the individual, from what I have searched in possible reliable sources appear to be found for the subject to pass WP:GNG. There are multiple mentions of the subject in relation to the subject's detention, and the ongoing interaction of the subject with the judicial process at Guantanamo Naval Base however the coverage has been more about those two events than the subject of the biography article; therefore, it is my opinion that the subject does not pass WP:ANYBIO or WP:SOLDIER. That being said the subject is a member of a notable group, and therefore a redirect can be made to said notable group.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 06:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - We know next to nothing about the subject of this article because he lacks "significant coverage" in reliable sources. Therefore he is not notable under WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 06:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Too little significant and specific coverage by secondary reliable sources, fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Given that the creator of this article has created what appears to be dozens or more likely hundreds similar articles on manifestly non-notable individuals that are currently sitting in mainspace and need to be deleted, the "merge" option is unrealistic here. Nobody has the time to sift through this mountain of obscure non-notable material and figure out what and how and where may be merged here. It should simply be deleted, period. Nsk92 (talk) 13:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - BLP1E. Being detained, even in Gitmo, is not a notable event. Subject fails to satisfy the general notability guidelines. Tarc (talk) 15:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.