Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (article improved, nom withdrawn); nac. JJL (talk) 02:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No claim to notability, currently an A7 candidate. The history reveals older, longer versions which appear to have been cut down for BLP or POV problems; at any rate, those that I looked at did not clearly establish notability either.  Sandstein  16:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Withdrawn following Andrew's rewrite, thanks!  Sandstein  05:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Qualifies as a speedy (no assertion of notability) but probably worth the finality of the AFD process to avoid trouble later. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no proof of notability, and the single external link is unreachable Rirunmot (talk) 23:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and replace with a dab page linking to The Devil in Miss Jones and The Devil and Miss Jones 76.66.203.200 (talk) 04:59, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not notable . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niteshift36 (talk • contribs)
• Redirect to WQHT - Keep - Jones was notable back in 2005 for controversial song on her radio show mocking the victims of the 2004 tsunami. Sources:
  • http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1496296/20050126/index.jhtml?headlines=true
  • http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9807E3D81F38F936A15752C0A9639C8B63
  • http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A01E0DF103BF930A35751C0A9639C8B63
  • http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/entertainment/2005/01/26/2005-01-26_hot_97_is_weathering__tsunam.html

--Andrewlp1991 (talk) 03:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC) - PS: She also meets WP:MUSIC for having released a charted album/singles. I've done some research and expanded the article based on several sources. --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 03:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Andrewlp1991 has demonstrated (with the sources above and what was added to the article) that the subject easily meets the general notability guideline. There's no indication from the other commenters in this AfD that anyone else made an attempt to search for sources. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Relisting comment Nominator has withdrawn as he is satisfied with a recent rewrite. However, there are still outstanding "delete" !votes. More comment is needed on the rewrite. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, meets WP:MUSICBIO #2, charted 2 singles and an album on national charts. Also has multiple independent reliable sources that provide non-trivial coverage of her. A new name 2008 (talk) 01:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.