Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miracle Star

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miracle Star

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article says it is obscure. The text was copied from terribletvshows.miraheze.org, that has a CC-by-SA license but no attribution was given. Neither the show nor the ryoga316 YouTuber have significant coverage. Mvqr (talk) 11:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete G12. CC-BY-SA 4.0 is not a compatible license per WP:COMPLIC. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you are right, I thought initially CC-by-SA was good because it is like Wikipedia but I missed that there is a CC-by-SA 4.0 exception in COMPLIC.--Mvqr (talk) 16:11, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CommentI added a reference discussing the series in the context of copycatting Gumball. A quick search in Chinese did not find anything useful, but maybe I am using the wrong name. Redirecting to The Amazing World of Gumball (season 5) would be a valid WP:ATD though. Jumpytoo Talk 04:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:07, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't see how this complies with WP:GNG and no attribution given to CC-BY-SA license, plus WP:G12. User3749 (talk) 10:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The copyvio content has been removed and RD1'd. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 21:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.