Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Mole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:59, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Mole

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was PRODed the other day and removed for not qualifying. I put it up again with a more substantial reason, not realizing that wasn't allowed, so that was removed again. This AfD is the result. As noted in my PROD attempt, he fails WP:NHOCKEY: not enough games in the AHL, and dressing for an NHL game is not enough to qualify Kaiser matias (talk) 14:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Brunswick-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clear failure of NHOCKEY, and I don't see any real chance of a GNG pass. I don't understand why the initial PROD was removed, no reason was given.18abruce (talk) 00:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The initial PROD was about the lack of citations; the article should have still been removed, but that was not a purpose to delete. Kaiser matias (talk) 01:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree with nom; this was an ephemeral player in the mid-minors. No evidence he meets the GNG. Ravenswing 15:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.