Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Tyler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Drmies (talk) 12:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Tyler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NSPORT... plus the reason the creator states "winning the jr US Open doubles".... per the US Open the event didn't exist in 1976. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep, took part in several Grand Slam tournaments in both singles and doubles events (see ITF) and easily meets the WP:NTENNIS notability requirements.--Wolbo (talk) 20:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She also participated in the Fed Cup and Wightman Cup.--Wolbo (talk) 21:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator of this I agree this is a strong Keep. I went by the sourcing given in the article which was 100% bogus sourcing. Hence the delete request. With this new info I retract the original AfD and ask for a quick close. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask, but User:Lugnuts voted to delete. If Lugnuts goes keep per nom, we can close this, but I'd rather they say something more substantive. Drmies (talk) 04:50, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep now it's been updated - nice work! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How about now @Drmies:? Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:08, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.