Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Sweet (police officer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Sweet (police officer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately, this policeman who was killed while on duty does not satisfy WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ANYBIO CerealKillerYum (talk) 03:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Kyle1278 (talk) 09:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Kyle1278 (talk) 09:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kyle1278 (talk) 10:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Kyle1278 (talk) 10:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Kyle1278 (talk) 10:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SOAP (his daughter is mentioned as pushing for benefits due to his death) and WP:MILL (most service-related deaths of peace officers do not make them notable, and, sadly, they are all too common). Bearian (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable by the standards of WP:BIO or WP:GNG.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none of this suggests any applicably better for notability. Unlikely anything better also to improve the article information-wise. SwisterTwister talk 06:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per WP:GNG: massive, detailed news coverage over the course 3 1/2 decades. A 36-year-old murder of a Toronto police officer with horrific detail (held hostage, tormented and taunted by his killer as he bled to death) seemed to have enough probability of passing WP:GNG to make me run a Proquest news archive search. The search turned up far more coverage than I expected. Not only was the event and trial covered in-depth, but 30 years later the mooted probation of the killer provoked an editorial in Winnipeg [1], which is a long way from Toronto. The first page simplest google search [2] on "Michael Sweet" + Toronto turns up sources that carry this crim past WP:GNG, , such as this 2012 story [3]. And coverage [4] continues in a current (2016) debate on which officers to list on an official police memorial. This is not a borderline case. It is the kind of crime that we keep because of enduring coverage, including discussion of this well-known crime in policy debates re:parole and police memorials.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:27, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unsourced and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Electoralist (talk) 02:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.