Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meshael Alayban

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meshael Alayban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Zigzig20s (talk) 11:42, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This does not rise above routine news coverage. Also fails the notability guidelines for crimes and criminals.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:17, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete because this is a possible WP:BLP issue. Human trafficking accusation but charges were dropped. Also WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E applies. Lightburst (talk) 23:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Notability is not shown. This is a one-paragraph, four-sentence article with four news stories and one press release used as inline citations that are about criminal charges against the subject in 2013 that were dismissed two months later without going to trial. The sources do not show notability. This clearly falls under WP:BLP1E and fails WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 00:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - For now. If notability is shown in the future please re-create.BabbaQ (talk) 19:10, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Appears to be a stub. Has WP:BLP issues. A re-write may be necessary with further content and references.Catorce2016 (talk) 10:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - we deleted by a huge consensus an article about a school superintendent who was an un-indicted co-conspirator of his janitor convicted of a mail bombing, which is much worst in my book. The only notability is a single arrest and no conviction. How is this in any way notable? Bearian (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.