Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxim Antoniuc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Giant Snowman 18:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maxim Antoniuc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was previously deleted by PROD. Fails WP:GNG (no significant coverage) and WP:NFOOTBALL (hasn't played in a fully-pro league or at senior international level). Giant Snowman 13:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete not notable and unreferenced. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 20:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Keep at least there is one reference. --Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom, standard non-notable footballer arguments. Fenix down (talk) 12:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Keep - Happy to withdraw per GS. Apologies also, assumed Moldova was not FPL. Will learn to check every time now! Fenix down (talk) 14:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Mr Antoniuc has nearly 100 appearances in the Moldovan National Division, which last time I looked was listed as fully professional at WP:FPL and thus passes the football-specific notability guideline. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I didn't realise the league was FPL. Happy to withdraw should @Ashbeckjonathan: and @Fenix down: with to reconsider their !votes? Giant Snowman 13:51, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.