Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Talbot Hostel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Pretty overwhelming keep consensus (non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Talbot Hostel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:CORPDEPTH. Kleuske (talk) 14:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nomination statement does not indicate that any search for sources was made, and it appears to be the case that this wasn't done. This is a very notable organisation, which over the years has enjoyed the patronage of governor generals and prime ministers. A Google News search [1] turns up lots of recent stories about or touching on this organisation. Nick-D (talk) 02:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it does seem to be a high profile organisation with significant coverage in reliable sources, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this hostel an integral part of the fabric of the area. Ozanam Learning Centre is a very valued asset and service, no reason to be deleting this type of useful information. Teraplane (talk) 23:27, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Have done some structural work in the article recently and fully agree with above. Definitely notable - and a good cause too ;)--Princheeseanastasia (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a Sydney institution in both senses. Have added a little more history. JennyOz (talk) 14:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.