Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Barvo
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 23:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Matthew Barvo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
From the same editor who brought us Kristin Owings, another non-notable, zero references article that brings up near zilch on Google. Joshdboz (talk) 20:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - He is not a pro athlete. I don't see any notable claims either, so the fact that there are no independent sources is moot. Clubmarx (talk) 00:08, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep The Guy seems notable but lacks verifable claims. TOEZ (talk) 00:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- FYI, The above user appears to have been blocked 10 minutes after making this comment. Joshdboz (talk) 01:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article has facebook and myspace pages as sources. Plus, he doesn't appear to be a professional athlete. NeoJustin (Talk page) 01:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of available reliable sources, and per the second half of User:TOEZ's comment. If the article's claims about the subject are not verifiable, that is a good reason to delete the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.