Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Vlček

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 06:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Vlček

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A check on the WP:BEFORE sees more results for the rally car driver of the same name then this football player who just scrapes by with 1 minute in a WP:FPL league. HawkAussie (talk) 02:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 02:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 02:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 02:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - young player with ongoing career who technically meets NFOOTBALL; needs improving not deleting. GiantSnowman 11:45, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @GiantSnowman: So what you are saying is a player that has played 1 minute of football passes the GNG test then. HawkAussie (talk) 00:06, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Although I don't follow football, I agree with GiantSnowman. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 19:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GiantSnowman. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 20:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GiantSnowman , passes WP:NFOOTY and subject is 24 years and is currently playing see no point in deleting it.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete has not met any standard of reasonable notability. the current football notability criteria are overly broad and we should stop slavishly following them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:24, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.