Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Krumich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:09, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Krumich

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. I don't think that the sources provided in the article are enough to indicate that this tennis player meets notability guidelines. Adamtt9 (talk) 01:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NTENNIS. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:58, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - meets #6 of WP:NTENNIS. Kolma8 (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly sure how he meets #6 of WP:NTENNIS. He doesn't hold any record that I can find according to the ITF. I just want to make sure there isn't a misunderstanding here of the meaning of "record". I think in this context it means holding some sort of record indicating a high mark that has not been bested by anyone else instead of the alternative meaning which is a win-loss record. A win-loss record according to the ITF would then suddenly make hundreds of thousands of tennis players notable. Adamtt9 (talk) 23:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails NTENNIS and GNG Spiderone 23:45, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet tennis notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.