Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Bellomo
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:13, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mark Bellomo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBIO. References are unreliable sources, cannot find any reliable sources or secondary media coverage. As far as I understand it, Youtube videos are not considered reliable. Rogermx (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Innisfree987 (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Innisfree987 (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete – Sources I found were either places to buy books (Amazon etc.), interviews on likely-unreliable websites (I agree with the essay Wikipedia:Interviews; they are generally primary sources and these ones are no exception) or just plain unreliable sources. He fails WP:GNG, his TV work, journalism and books do not satisfy WP:NCREATIVE, and his academic work does not meet WP:NACADEMIC. – Teratix ₵ 09:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for doing more research! Rogermx (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.