Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marek Małecki
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 01:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Marek Małecki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Equestrian who does not satisfy sports notability. There are two references. The first one is a database entry, and database entries do not establish sports notability. The second is an obituary, which may count toward general notability but is the only significant source. He competed in the Olympics, but does not have Olympic notability because he did not receive a medal.
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | https://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/ma/marek-malecki-1.html | A Wayback Machine copy of a database entry of sports statistics | Yes | No | Yes | No |
2 | hejnakon.pl | Obituary in Polish equestrian magazine. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
The Heymann criterion is to find additional sources within six days.
- Draftify as nominator, to allow six months to find better coverage. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Poland. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Draftify precisely per Robert McClenon. BD2412 T 00:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there any additional support for Draftify outcome?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) No one is going to do anything with this in draftspace – it will go untouched and deleted. Focusing on the source, it is over 600 words on him and mentions he was a multiple time national champion. It is SIGCOV. We do not have access to Polish newspaper sources from the time, but still have a pass of WP:SPORTCRIT. I don't think this should be draftified – why should it not be kept? BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, per the source found and Enos733. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The obituary points to a reliable source. "Poniżej tekst o Marku Małeckim z książki Mistrzowie Polski wydanej w roku 2010 przez Akademię Jeździecką:" in English - "Below is a text about Marek Małecki from the book Champions of Poland published in 2010 by the Equestrian Academy." I think that work is online here: https://pcbj.pl/0496-2/ > https://olimpijski.pl/olimpijczycy/malecki-marek-wladyslaw/. On that page, it has this bibliography with multiple sources: "Bibl.: Głuszek, Leksykon 1999, s. 267; Pawlak, Olimpijczycy, s. 163; Habinowska, Ludzie i konie, s. 227, 305, 403; Jeźdźcy olimpijscy, s. 67-69; Kronika Sportu, s.900; Księga sportu, s. 480; Porada, Igrzyska, s. 884; Baza danych Muzeum Łowiectwa i Jeździectwa w Warszawie; Wywiad środowiskowy" "Głuszek, Leksykon 1999, p. 267; Pawlak, Olympians, p. 163; Habinowska, People and horses, pp. 227, 305, 403; Olympic Riders, pp. 67-69; Chronicle of Sport, p.900; Sports Book, p. 480; Advice, Games, p. 884; Database of the Hunting and Riding Museum in Warsaw; Community interview." Without access to this material, I cannot really go further, but my sense is that sufficient sources are available. --Enos733 (talk) 05:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - per above - and agreeing with BeanieFan11's comments on draftification.Ingratis (talk) 19:38, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.