Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcelo Altamirano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo Altamirano

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer with brief professional career and no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC as far as I can see. A Chilean source search yields mostly social media and an empty ESPN profile page. He has a few namesakes in sports, who don't seem notable either, but may confuse you if searching. The man described in Uno Entre Ríós is a PE teacher from Argentina born in 1988, so cannot be the same person as this Chilean goalkeeper. Likewise, the man described in El Esquiú was a vice president of a federation back in 1980, so it's impossible for him to be the same person as this Altamirano. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Chile. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Brief career, not notable enough . --Bedivere (talk) 00:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis. Jogurney (talk) 18:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 06:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.