Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maravilla (gangs)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - TP 15:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maravilla (gangs) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been thrice deleted under different names, under the first and fourth AFDs for Maravilla (which is now a disam page), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Maravilla. User attempted to create this through AFC, but when his request was denied, he waited until he had enough edits to be autoconfirmed, and then moved it into mainspace Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 05:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep just because an article has a delete-history doesnt mean it can be kept in the future in sources are found. like in this case.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are those sources reliable? I don't think so Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 23:53, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and WP:SALT - as per nom - low notability time sink. Off2riorob (talk) 03:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and nuke the remains. This article (under various names) has been previously deleted via AFD, PROD and for copyright violation[1] but since first created in 2005, it has yet to be proved that the subject is notable via reliable sources. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 00:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.