Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malachi Love-Robinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Malachi Love-Robinson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject commited fraud as a minor, and subsequently has been found guilty of fraud on two occasions since then. None of this would normally get much attention - and it doesn't appear that there has been that much attention - if it wasn't for the earlier case as a minor which was unusual. I'm not seeing enough here to justify an article and I'm concerned about the BLP implications considering that most of this occured as a minor: per WP:CRIME I'd be looking for evidence that the subject is a significant figure or that there is sufficient coverage to pass this "historically significant" bar, but I'm not really seeing evidence of either. Bilby (talk) 05:53, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bilby (talk) 05:53, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Reluctant keep. The article may be poorly written. The subject may not merit ongoing coverage. However, this Dr. Love story has just enough Florida Man oddity to attract ongoing media attention, especially since he is allegedly still practicing medicine as of January 2021.[1] • Gene93k (talk) 10:22, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I think the BLP concerns are just too high to keep such an article on a living person. The coverage is clearly not high enough to say that people would find it odd that Wikipedia lacked an article on this individual and I really do not think there is justification to have such an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom, per WP:CRIME, not significant CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Everything about this article seems wrong. Poorly-written with significant tone issues. KidAd • SPEAK 04:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.