Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmoud Elhenidy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmoud Elhenidy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability found, sources (external links) are not independent but organisations he works for or with. Perhaps better sources are available in Egyptian publications, but internationally, or in Germany where he now works, he seems to be hardly known. I can't find evidence of any "Dance de Lagos" in Portugal. Fram (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Dance, Egypt, and Germany. Fram (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff in the article is unverifiable as well, e.g. I can't find no evidence of a diploma called "Royal Danish Ballet School technique". The membership of the Unesco CID is a paid, open to all membership, not some distinction. His school in Berlin is extremely minor[1]. Fram (talk) 11:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Despite a good deal of searching, I wasn't able to find any significant coverage either. Unless there are large numbers of sources that I'm missing due to the language barrier (and I think that's quite unlikely), he does not appear to meet either WP:NARTIST or the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.