Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maghella

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (actually pretty much leaning keep)--Ymblanter (talk) 08:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maghella

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability because Google results are unreliable. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - The nominator has not done WP:BEFORE. The article also exists in French and Italian Wikipedian - see links [1] and [2]. Had also in same fashion nominated Zora Vampire without doing any research. Thanks Jethwarp (talk) 14:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 19:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Just because the article exists on another 'pedia doesn't mean it gets one here, Then there's the sources .... well there isn't any (There is however a Trivia section on the French 'pedia but that proves nothing!), Anyway I can't find any shred of notability so delete. –Davey2010^Talk 20:26, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment : I dont know why you think there is no notability. there are enough sources if you do google web and images [3]. Also Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopaedia and any comic books or comic charterers, which has so many images and book history - and especially which is part of an historical era of erotic vampire cult comic - is itself notable. Thanks! Jethwarp (talk) 03:32, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree we are an encyclopaedia and we should keep as many articles as possible, But like this article there's some that just aren't notable enough to be here, Even looking through Google I can't find anything, thanks –Davey2010^Talk 03:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I found some more references on book search in Italian language [4]. Jethwarp (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A film inspired from charterer named "Maghella" was made in 1974 shot by noted French director Francis Leroi, which also establishes the notability. Thanks. Jethwarp (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- "Sources do not have to be available online or written in English." Possible sources based on a admitedly superficial search and quick translation sanity check: 1, 2, 3, 4. (NSFW, duh) —Noah 16:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.